CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+3395%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro 2000M
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
8192
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K500
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy