Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
8080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +5753%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro VX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
8192
Shading Units
112
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
252.0 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G92
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy