Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 732.2GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1442MHz
Lower TDP (235W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +42%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100
10.34 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
8192
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
128
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
235W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP100
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy