Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 317.4GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +115%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 24 GB
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
3072
256
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM200
-
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
8 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy