Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M

Intel Arctic Sound-M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
8184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +113361%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
8192
Shading Units
8
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.80 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
10W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-613-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy