Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
7936 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1518MHz
Lower TDP (18W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +1798%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P500 Mobile
0.777 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1455 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1518 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
256
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.29 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.29 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.14 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
777.2 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.29 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
18W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy