Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

VS

Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 5 months late

Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)

3584 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages

Boost Clock1620MHz

More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)

Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Arctic Sound M

14.75 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1%

14.93 TFLOPS

Arctic Sound M

VS

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Aug 2018

Data Center GPU

Generation

Quadro

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1230 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1620 MHz

1200 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

48GB

HBM2e

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

384bit

1229GB/s

Bandwidth

672.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

72

8192

Shading Units

4608

256

TMUs

288

128

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

576

-

RT Cores

72

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

8 MB

L2 Cache

6 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

155.5 GPixel/s

230.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

466.6 GTexel/s

29.49 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

29.86 TFLOPS

14.75 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

14.93 TFLOPS

3.686 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

466.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W

TDP

260W

900 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

8-pin EPS

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound

GPU Name

TU102

-

GPU Variant

TU102-875-A1

Generation 12.5

Architecture

Turing

Intel

Foundry

TSMC

10 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8 billion

Transistors

18.6 billion

190 mm²

Die Size

754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

2

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

3

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

4

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL

5

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4

6

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

7

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

8

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV

9

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB

10

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Related News

1

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

2

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

3

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

4

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

5

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

6

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

7

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

8

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

9

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

10

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game