CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA RTX A4500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 640.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (200W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A4500
+60%
23.65 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
RTX A4500
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
20GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
8192
Shading Units
7168
256
TMUs
224
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
200W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy