Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 +131%
34.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2022
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
8192
Shading Units
10240
256
TMUs
320
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
230W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy