Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 +1390%
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
495 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy