Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.67GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP +9%
0.143 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
120
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GT216
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy