Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs Intel Arc Pro A50

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (192GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (2350MHz vs 1837MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +1189%
62.08 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Aug 2022
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
96bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
1024
528
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
75W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Blackwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
208 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy