Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
16832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +29746%
62.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
8
16896
Shading Units
64
528
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

1000W
TDP
105W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
G94B
-
-
-
Blackwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
208 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
Unknown
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy