Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (96GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
14336 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (2040MHz vs 1837MHz)
Lower TDP (205W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +494%
62.08 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Dec 2019
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

96GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

132
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
40
16896
Shading Units
2560
528
TMUs
160
24
ROPs
64
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
Navi 10
-
GPU Variant
-
Blackwell
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
208 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
251 mm²

Board Design

1000W
TDP
205W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy