Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4360 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +8670%
12.63 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
120
280
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
RV630
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy