Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1837MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 1493GB/s)
12416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12.63 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +391%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2024
Mining GPUs
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
96GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM3e
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
16896
280
TMUs
528
128
ROPs
24
280
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GB100
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
208 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

250W
TDP
1000W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
9.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy