Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 172.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1700MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +3%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
4480
Shading Units
1792
280
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
28
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Navi 33
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 33
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy