Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1410MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +912%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2017
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
4480
Shading Units
512
280
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Lexa
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy