Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1785MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX +19%
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Aug 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
1280
88
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
85W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Navi 14
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy