Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs ATI FirePro V3800

NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3184 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX +2028%
11.07 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
400
192
TMUs
20
80
ROPs
8
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
5 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
Redwood
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy