Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX +1341%
11.07 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
5 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy