Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+269%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Data Center GPU
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
96bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
8192
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
DG2-512
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
