Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +3934%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Oct 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
G96
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy