Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

VS

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages

Released 10 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock2050MHz

More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)

3904 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages

Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Data Center GPU Flex 170 +3397%

16.79 TFLOPS

Quadro 2000D

0.48 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Flex 170

VS

Quadro 2000D

Graphics Card

Aug 2022

Release Date

Oct 2011

Data Center GPU

Generation

Quadro

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz

Base Clock

-

2050 MHz

Boost Clock

-

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

650 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

1024MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

256bit

Memory Bus

128bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

41.60GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

4

-

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

192

256

TMUs

32

128

ROPs

16

-

Tensor Cores

-

32

RT Cores

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

16 MB

L2 Cache

256 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

5.000 GPixel/s

524.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

20.00 GTexel/s

33.59 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

16.79 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

480.0 GFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512

GPU Name

GF106

ACM-G10

GPU Variant

GF106-875-KA-A1

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Fermi

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

40 nm

21.7 billion

Transistors

1.17 billion

406 mm²

Die Size

238 mm²

Board Design

150W

TDP

62W

450 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

Outputs

2x DVI

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

-

CUDA

2.1

6.6

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

2

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10

3

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

4

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

5

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

6

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

7

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

8

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16 GB

9

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile

10

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip