CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
VS
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 154W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+7200%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G80
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
154W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
3
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
4
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
5
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M
6
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M
7
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
8
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070 Q
9
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
10
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA RTX A5000
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy