Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+14374%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT216
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
