Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 166% (2050MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +372%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
2304
256
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK110B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy