Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +180693%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Oct 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
16384
Shading Units
16
1024
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

2400W
TDP
21W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy