ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
RTX A400
+1779%
2.706 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2024
FireGL
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
120
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GA107
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
