Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FirePro S9170

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +1090%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2015
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Hawaii
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy