Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +1715%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Capsaicin
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy