Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FirePro V5900

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900 +39%
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
May 2011
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cayman
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy