Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FirePro V3750

ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (48W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600 +25%
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
48W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
RV730
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy