Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FirePro V3800

ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800 +18%
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
400
16
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Redwood
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy