Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FirePro V8700

ATI FireGL V8600 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (151W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700 +172%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
800
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
151W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
RV770
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy