Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +116%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Dec 2013
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cape Verde
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy