Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600 +877%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT218
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy