Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (159W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 +53%
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
320
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
219W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT200B
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy