Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

ATI FireGL V8600 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600 +340%
0.44 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GF119
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy