Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 +62%
0.717 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cape Verde
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy