Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon HD 6350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6350 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600 +323%
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6350
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Feb 2011
FireGL
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
80
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cedar
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy