Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo +3102%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2019
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM2
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
475W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Vega 20
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy