Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +612%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
32bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Navi 24
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Navi 24
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy