Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +276%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2019
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Polaris 23
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy