Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 +13%
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

159W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Oland
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy