Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265X OEM +438%
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Curacao
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy