Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +713%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Navi 24
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy