Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 159W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 +266%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2015
FireGL
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Tobago
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy