Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +830%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Tahiti
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy