Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs ATI FireGL V5600

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs ATI FireGL V5600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 89W)
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2007
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
-
Shading Units
120
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
89W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy